Cohort assessment feedback for coding and skills bootcamps
Scorafy gives bootcamps a way to deliver individual, criteria-mapped feedback at cohort scale. Learners submit project work and written reflections; the AI maps each submission to the rubric you define and drafts personalised feedback. Instructors review and finalise, so feedback stays high quality even as cohorts grow.
Free plan - no card required. Trial it on one assessment.
The problem this solves
Where coding and skills bootcamps commonly lose time and consistency.
- Instructor feedback time scales linearly with cohort size and becomes the bottleneck
- Feedback quality drops under deadline pressure at the end of a sprint
- Learners get inconsistent depth of feedback depending on who marks their work
- Generic quiz tools cannot assess project submissions against a rubric
- Hard to show learners exactly where they sit against the competency bar
How Scorafy fits the workflow
The AI drafts, a qualified human reviews and decides.
Define the project rubric
Set the criteria and performance levels for the project or milestone, or adapt a structured template.
Learners submit work
Written reflections and uploaded artefacts (documents, write-ups) are captured for analysis.
AI drafts per-learner feedback
Each submission is mapped to the rubric and turned into specific, individual feedback - the same standard across the whole cohort.
Instructors review and release
Instructors adjust the draft, add context, and release feedback to learners. The teaching judgement stays human.
Why it works for coding and skills bootcamps
The specific gains for this use case.
What Scorafy does and does not do
Scorafy drafts feedback for instructors to review. It is not an automated grader that releases results without a human. Instructors review, adjust, and decide what learners see.
Frequently asked questions
Can it assess project work, not just quizzes?
Yes. Learners can submit written reflections and upload documents, and the AI maps the submission to the rubric you define. It is built for open-ended work, not only closed quizzes.
Does it release feedback automatically?
No. It produces a draft. An instructor reviews and decides what is released. The human stays in control of what learners receive.
How does it handle large cohorts?
Each submission is analysed individually against the same rubric, so a 10-person cohort and a 100-person cohort get the same standard. Paid plans scale response limits - see the pricing page.
What does it cost?
There is a free plan to trial it. Paid plans start at $39 USD per month, with higher response limits on the higher tiers.
Related resources
See it on your own assessment
Start free, build one assessment, and see the AI-drafted feedback for yourself.