Assessment feedback for HR and recruitment teams
Scorafy helps HR and recruitment teams assess open-ended candidate work - written responses, take-home tasks, work samples - against a hiring rubric you define. The AI reads each submission, maps it to your scorecard and drafts evidence-referenced feedback. A reviewer checks and signs off, so decisions stay consistent, defensible and human. It is not an applicant tracking system and does not make the hire.
Free plan - no card required. Trial it on one assessment.
The problem this solves
Where hr and recruitment teams commonly lose time and consistency.
- Screening open-ended responses and take-home tasks by hand does not scale across a candidate pool
- Different reviewers score the same work differently, which undermines fairness and defensibility
- Standardised test libraries do not assess the actual written or applied work for the role
- Feedback to candidates is thin or absent because writing it for everyone takes too long
- Bias and consistency concerns require evidence-referenced reasoning, not gut-feel scores
How Scorafy fits the workflow
The AI drafts, a qualified human reviews and decides.
Define the hiring rubric
Set the criteria and performance levels for the role - the scorecard you want every candidate judged against - or adapt a structured template.
Collect candidate work
Candidates submit written responses, take-home tasks or uploaded work samples. Open-ended answers are captured for analysis, not just stored.
AI drafts scored feedback
Scorafy reads each submission, maps it to your rubric levels, and drafts evidence-referenced feedback - the same standard for the first candidate and the last.
Reviewer signs off
A hiring reviewer checks the draft, adjusts the judgement and makes the decision. Every result has a human sign-off and an audit trail.
Why it works for hr and recruitment teams
The specific gains for this use case.
What Scorafy does and does not do
Scorafy is not an applicant tracking system and does not make hiring decisions. It drafts rubric-mapped, evidence-referenced feedback for a reviewer, who makes and is accountable for the decision. Used for selection, it should support a human judgement, not automate it.
Frequently asked questions
Does Scorafy decide who to hire?
No. It drafts rubric-mapped, evidence-referenced feedback on candidate work. A reviewer checks it, adjusts it and makes the decision. The human stays accountable, with an audit trail on every result.
Can it use our own hiring scorecard?
Yes. You define the criteria and performance levels for the role, and the AI maps each submission against your scorecard. You can start from a structured template and adapt it.
How is this different from a test platform like TestGorilla?
Standardised test platforms score set tests against a fixed key. Scorafy reads the actual open-ended work - written responses, take-home tasks - and grades it against your rubric, with a human signing off. See the comparison pages for detail.
Is candidate data handled responsibly?
Scorafy is operated by Cognitiv Pty Ltd. Data is isolated per organisation with row-level security, the primary region is EU (Dublin) with optional Sydney residency, and data is not used to train AI models. See the privacy and trust pages.
Related resources
Templates to start from
Compare alternatives
Other use cases
See it on your own assessment
Start free, build one assessment, and see the AI-drafted feedback for yourself.