Assessment feedback for government and public-sector training
Scorafy supports government and public-sector training teams by drafting rubric-mapped, evidence-referenced feedback on workforce competency and training submissions. A public-sector assessor reviews the draft and makes the decision. It brings consistency, an audit trail and data-residency options to assessment at scale, without removing the human judgement. It is not a system of record and does not make the assessment decision.
Free plan - no card required. Trial it on one assessment.
The problem this solves
Where government and public-sector training teams commonly lose time and consistency.
- Assessing workforce competency at scale strains assessor capacity and turnaround
- Consistency and auditability are scrutinised, and feedback must reference the evidence
- Data residency, sovereignty and procurement requirements constrain tool choice
- Generic survey and quiz tools cannot map open-ended responses to a competency framework
- Manual marking does not scale across large public-sector cohorts
How Scorafy fits the workflow
The AI drafts, a qualified human reviews and decides.
Define the competency framework
Set the criteria and performance levels that reflect the capability standard, or adapt a structured template.
Staff submit evidence
Written responses and uploaded documents are captured for analysis against the framework.
AI drafts rubric-mapped feedback
Each submission is mapped to the framework and turned into a consistent, evidence-referenced draft.
Assessor reviews and signs off
A qualified assessor reviews the draft, applies judgement and makes the decision of record, with a full audit trail.
Why it works for government and public-sector training teams
The specific gains for this use case.
What Scorafy does and does not do
Scorafy is not a workforce system of record and does not make the assessment or workforce decision. It drafts rubric-mapped feedback for a qualified assessor to review and finalise. Agencies remain responsible for their own procurement, data-handling and accreditation requirements; review the trust and privacy pages against them.
Frequently asked questions
Where is data stored?
The primary region is EU (Dublin), with optional Sydney data residency. Data is isolated per organisation with row-level security and is not used to train AI models. Review the trust and privacy pages against your requirements.
Does it make the assessment decision?
No. It drafts rubric-mapped, evidence-referenced feedback. A qualified assessor reviews it and makes the decision of record, with an audit trail. The human stays accountable.
Can it map to our capability framework?
Yes. You define the criteria and performance levels, and the AI maps each submission against them. You can start from a structured template and adapt it.
Does it support audit and review?
Yes. Feedback references the submitted evidence against your criteria, and every result carries a human sign-off and audit trail, which supports transparent, defensible review.
Related resources
Templates to start from
Compare alternatives
Other use cases
See it on your own assessment
Start free, build one assessment, and see the AI-drafted feedback for yourself.