Assessment feedback for Registered Training Organisations
Scorafy is an AI assessment-feedback layer for RTOs. It reads a learner's written submission, maps it against a rubric you define, and produces an evidence-referenced draft of feedback that a qualified trainer reviews and finalises. It does not replace your student management system or the assessor's judgement - it removes the hours spent hand-writing consistent, rubric-mapped feedback for every learner.
Free plan - no card required. Trial it on one assessment.
The problem this solves
Where registered training organisations commonly lose time and consistency.
- Trainers spend hours writing individual feedback that has to be mapped to rubric criteria and the rules of evidence
- Feedback quality and consistency vary between assessors and over a long marking session
- Validation findings repeatedly flag thin or generic feedback that does not reference the evidence
- Scaling cohorts means scaling marking time linearly - there is no leverage
- Generic quiz and form tools do not understand competency-based, rubric-mapped assessment
How Scorafy fits the workflow
The AI drafts, a qualified human reviews and decides.
Define the rubric
Build the assessment with criteria and performance levels using the rubric builder, or start from a structured template and adapt it to the unit.
Collect submissions
Learners respond in their own words and can upload documents. Open-ended answers are captured for analysis, not just stored.
AI drafts the feedback
Scorafy reads each submission, maps it to the rubric levels you defined, and writes an individual, evidence-referenced draft - the same standard for the first learner and the last.
Trainer reviews and finalises
A qualified trainer or assessor checks the draft, adjusts the judgement, and makes the competent / not-yet-competent decision. The human stays accountable.
Why it works for registered training organisations
The specific gains for this use case.
What Scorafy does and does not do
Scorafy is not a student management system and does not make the final competency decision or handle AVETMISS, funding, or government reporting. It is the layer that drafts rubric-mapped feedback for a qualified assessor to review. The assessor remains responsible for the assessment judgement.
Frequently asked questions
Does Scorafy make the competency decision?
No. Scorafy produces a draft of rubric-mapped, evidence-referenced feedback. A qualified trainer or assessor reviews it, adjusts it, and makes the competent or not-yet-competent decision. The human assessor stays accountable for the judgement.
Does it replace our student management system?
No. Scorafy sits alongside your existing SMS or LMS. It does not manage enrolments, AVETMISS data, funding claims, or government reporting. It only handles the assessment-feedback step.
Can we map it to a specific unit of competency?
Yes. You define the rubric criteria and performance levels for the assessment, so the feedback is mapped to the requirements you set. You can start from a structured template and adapt it to the unit.
What does it cost?
There is a free plan to trial it on one assessment. Paid plans start at $39 USD per month, with higher limits and PDF export on the higher tiers. Pricing is on the pricing page.
Is learner data handled responsibly?
Scorafy is operated by Cognitiv Pty Ltd. See the privacy policy and AI transparency pages for how data and the AI analysis are handled. Configurable data-retention settings are available.
Related resources
Templates to start from
Compare alternatives
See it on your own assessment
Start free, build one assessment, and see the AI-drafted feedback for yourself.