Competency assessment support for healthcare credentialing
Scorafy supports healthcare credentialing and clinical competency teams by drafting criteria-mapped, evidence-referenced feedback on written and submitted competency evidence. A qualified clinical assessor reviews the draft and makes the sign-off decision. It improves consistency and defensibility of competency judgements without removing the clinician from the loop. It is not a credentialing registry and does not make the credentialing decision.
Free plan - no card required. Trial it on one assessment.
The problem this solves
Where healthcare credentialing and clinical competency teams commonly lose time and consistency.
- Assessor consistency is hard to maintain across many clinicians and multiple assessors
- Defensible sign-off requires feedback that explicitly references the candidate's evidence
- Manual assessment of written clinical-reasoning and competency evidence does not scale
- Generic survey tools cannot map responses to a clinical competency framework
- Audit, revalidation and appeals demand well-documented, criteria-referenced reasoning
How Scorafy fits the workflow
The AI drafts, a qualified human reviews and decides.
Encode the competency framework
Define the criteria and performance levels that reflect your clinical competency standard.
Candidates submit evidence
Written responses, reflective accounts and uploaded documents are captured for analysis against the framework.
AI drafts criteria-mapped feedback
Each submission is mapped to the framework and turned into a consistent, evidence-referenced draft.
Qualified assessor signs off
A qualified clinical assessor reviews the draft, applies professional judgement and makes the competency decision of record.
Why it works for healthcare credentialing and clinical competency teams
The specific gains for this use case.
What Scorafy does and does not do
Scorafy is not a credentialing or registry system and does not make clinical or credentialing decisions. It drafts criteria-mapped feedback for a qualified assessor, who makes and is accountable for the sign-off. It is not a clinical decision-support or diagnostic tool.
Frequently asked questions
Does Scorafy make the credentialing decision?
No. It drafts criteria-mapped, evidence-referenced feedback. A qualified clinical assessor reviews it and makes the decision. Accountability stays with the assessor and the credentialing body.
Can it map to our clinical competency framework?
Yes. You define the criteria and performance levels that represent your standard, and the AI maps each submission against them.
Is it a clinical decision-support tool?
No. Scorafy assesses competency evidence against a framework you define for credentialing and training. It is not a diagnostic or clinical decision-support system.
How is sensitive data handled?
Scorafy is operated by Cognitiv Pty Ltd. Data is isolated per organisation with row-level security, the primary region is EU (Dublin) with optional Sydney residency, and data is not used to train AI models. Review the privacy and trust pages against your own obligations.
Related resources
Templates to start from
Compare alternatives
Other use cases
See it on your own assessment
Start free, build one assessment, and see the AI-drafted feedback for yourself.