Evidence that your L&D programmes actually moved capability
Scorafy helps learning and development teams answer the question every programme sponsor asks: did this change anything? Learners respond in their own words before and after a programme, the AI evaluates each response against the capability rubric you define and cites the evidence behind every judgement, and your team reviews before release. Individual reports give each learner specific next steps; cohort reports give you the programme-level evidence to take to the business.
Free plan - no card required. Trial it on one assessment.
The problem this solves
Where learning and development teams commonly lose time and consistency.
- Smile sheets and attendance figures cannot answer whether capability moved
- Every learner gets the same generic post-programme summary because individual feedback does not scale
- Programme sponsors want evidence of impact and the available data is participation, not performance
- Skills-gap findings arrive as a dashboard, not as specific next steps a person can act on
- Survey tools aggregate ratings but cannot read what a learner wrote and judge it against a standard
How Scorafy fits the workflow
The AI drafts, a qualified human reviews and decides.
Encode the capability framework
Turn the framework the programme targets into a rubric - criteria and performance levels - with a grading schema and your own terminology, so the output speaks your organisation's language.
Assess before and after
Learners respond in their own words, and can upload work samples or answer by video or audio with transcription. The same rubric runs at both points, so the comparison is like for like.
Evaluate against the standard
Each response is evaluated in about a minute against your criteria, with the evidence for every level quoted from the learner's own answer rather than asserted.
Review, release, then report up
Your team reviews and releases individual reports, and cohort reports aggregate the results into the programme-level picture - distribution, shared strengths, common gaps.
Why it works for learning and development teams
The specific gains for this use case.
What Scorafy does and does not do
Scorafy is not an LMS, an LXP or a skills-taxonomy platform. It does not host courses, track completions or manage learning pathways, and it does not integrate over LTI. It evaluates what learners write against your rubric and drafts reports your team reviews and releases. It measures capability against a standard you set; it does not prove business outcomes on its own.
Frequently asked questions
Does this replace our LMS?
No. It sits alongside it. Scorafy does not host content, track completions or manage pathways - it evaluates open-ended learner responses against your rubric and produces individual and cohort reports. There is no LTI integration; connect it via the REST API v1 and webhooks if you need it in another system.
How do we show a programme worked?
Run the same rubric before and after the programme and compare. Each learner gets an evidence-cited evaluation at both points, and cohort reports aggregate the distribution and common gaps. That is evidence of capability change against a standard you defined - it is not, on its own, proof of a business outcome.
Can we use our own capability framework and language?
Yes. You define the criteria and performance levels, and terminology sets let you set the vocabulary the reports use, so output reads in your organisation's language rather than generic assessment jargon.
Who signs off on what learners see?
Your team does. Reports stay in draft until someone reviews and releases them, any score can be overridden with a comment, and the release is recorded. Learners see nothing before that point.
Related resources
Other use cases
See it on your own assessment
Start free, build one assessment, and see the AI-drafted feedback for yourself.