Assessment feedback for universities and higher education
Scorafy helps university teaching teams produce consistent, rubric-mapped feedback on written work at cohort scale. It reads each student's submission, maps it to the marking criteria you define, and drafts evidence-referenced feedback. Academics and tutors review, adjust and make the grading decision. It is not an LMS or student information system, and it does not replace academic judgement.
Free plan - no card required. Trial it on one assessment.
The problem this solves
Where universities and higher education commonly lose time and consistency.
- Marking large cohorts of essays and short-answer work is slow and dominates teaching time
- Feedback consistency drifts across tutors and markers and over a long marking session
- Students receive thin feedback because detailed, individual comments do not scale
- Generic quiz and survey tools cannot map open-ended answers to a marking rubric
- Moderation and appeals need feedback that explicitly references the student's work
How Scorafy fits the workflow
The AI drafts, a qualified human reviews and decides.
Define the marking rubric
Set the criteria and performance levels for the assessment, or adapt a structured template, so the AI maps to your standard.
Students submit work
Written responses and uploaded documents are captured for analysis, not just collected.
AI drafts rubric-mapped feedback
Scorafy reads each submission and drafts individual, evidence-referenced feedback against your criteria - the same standard across the cohort.
Academics review and grade
A tutor or academic reviews the draft, applies judgement and makes the grading decision. The academic stays accountable.
Why it works for universities and higher education
The specific gains for this use case.
What Scorafy does and does not do
Scorafy is not a learning management system or student information system and does not assign final grades. It drafts rubric-mapped feedback for an academic to review. Used for graded assessment, it supports academic judgement, and any academic-integrity checks remain your institution's responsibility.
Frequently asked questions
Does Scorafy grade students automatically?
No. It drafts rubric-mapped, evidence-referenced feedback. An academic or tutor reviews it, adjusts it and makes the grading decision. The human stays accountable.
Can it map to our marking criteria?
Yes. You define the criteria and performance levels for the assessment, and the AI maps each submission against them. You can start from a structured template and adapt it.
Does it handle essays and uploaded documents?
Yes. It reads open-ended written answers and can analyse uploaded documents, which is where most marking effort goes.
What about academic integrity?
Scorafy assesses the submitted work against your rubric. It is not a plagiarism or AI-detection tool, and integrity checks remain your institution's responsibility. A human academic reviews and decides on every result.
Related resources
Other use cases
See it on your own assessment
Start free, build one assessment, and see the AI-drafted feedback for yourself.