Side by side
Scorafy vs Inspera Graide
Graide's classification AI learns to mark from how your best markers have marked before, inside a university e-assessment estate. Scorafy marks against a rubric you write explicitly, from the first submission - no marking history to learn from - and wraps each result in a release gate, an override ledger, and an Audit Pack.
AI-powered assessment platform that analyses each respondent's specific answers and generates a unique, personalised report with personalised strengths, development areas, and recommendations.
Free plan available. Self-serve paid plans from $39 USD/month (Starter) to $249/month (Pro), with Business and Enterprise plans quoted. Per-respondent AI assessment is included on every paid plan.
Inspera Graide is an AI-assisted marking tool for higher education, part of the Inspera e-assessment platform. It uses classification AI that learns from an institution's own markers to suggest grades and feedback, with every suggestion accepted or rejected by an educator, and integrates with Inspera Assessment or an existing LMS via LTI.
Institutional pricing quoted on request, not self-serve. Checked 16 Aug 2026 - see inspera.com for current terms.
Feature by feature
Feature comparison
A side-by-side look at what each platform offers.
| Feature | Scorafy | Inspera Graide |
|---|---|---|
| AI-assisted marking of written answers | ||
| Marking approach | Rubric you author | Learns from your markers |
| Works from the first submission (no marking history needed) | ||
| Human review of every result | ||
| Per-criterion rubric marks with cited evidence | ||
| Release gate before respondent sees any result | ||
| Override ledger (AI score + reviewer decision retained) | ||
| Audit Pack export per result | ||
| Mathematical equations and expressions | ||
| LMS / LTI integration | ||
| Part of a full e-assessment platform (exams, proctoring) | ||
| AI marking of audio, video and file responses | ||
| Self-serve sign-up + free plan |
Honest take
Where each platform excels
An honest look at what each platform does best.
Inspera Graide strengths
- Built for higher-education marking at institutional scale, used by established research universities
- Every AI suggestion is accepted or rejected by an educator - nothing automatic
- Handles mathematical equations and expressions alongside essays and short answers
- Integrates with Inspera Assessment or an existing LMS via LTI
- Sits inside a full e-assessment platform covering digital exams and proctoring
- Marks against an explicit rubric you author - no need for a history of marked scripts to learn from
- Cites evidence from the submission for every criterion score, not just a suggested grade
- Release gate, override ledger, and Audit Pack make each judgement independently auditable
- AI-marks audio, video, and file submissions as well as written answers
- Self-serve and free to trial - no institutional procurement to see report quality
- Works for RTOs, workplaces, and coaching contexts, not only university marking
Why choose Scorafy?
The fundamental difference is in how responses are analysed. Most platforms - including Inspera Graide - treat responses as data points for aggregate reporting or template-based result pages.
Scorafy reads each respondent's specific answers - including free-text responses - and generates a completely unique assessment report. Every person gets personalised strengths, development areas, and actionable recommendations written specifically for them.
Unique
Report per respondent
~1 min
AI analysis time
All plans
AI reports included
Our honest recommendation
Inspera Graide is the right choice for higher-education e-assessment estates - universities marking at scale inside Inspera or an LTI-connected LMS, especially where maths marking and educator-in-the-loop suggestions fit existing workflows. Scorafy has no LMS or LTI integration, no proctoring, and no maths engine. Choose Scorafy when you are outside that estate - RTOs, workplace training, certification - and want rubric-explicit marking that works from the first submission, with per-criterion evidence, a release gate, and an Audit Pack behind every result.
Also compare
See it live
Ready to try a different approach?
See what per-respondent AI analysis looks like. Try the interactive demo or start your free plan today.
Free plan included · No credit card required