Skip to main content
Back to home
AI assessment

AI assessment for QA testers

Rubric-graded, human signed-off. Not a quiz generator.

Try it free

Free plan - no card required.

Scorafy is the assessment-feedback layer for QA and software testing bootcamps and academies. It reads a learner's actual submission - a test plan, a set of test cases, a bug report, an automation script or a recorded walkthrough - then scores it against your own rubric with cited evidence taken from the work. An instructor reviews every result and signs off before it is recorded, so no judgement is made by software alone. It is not a test runner, defect tracker or LMS - it reads the testing work the way an instructor would and handles the grading and feedback alongside the tools you already use.

What you assess for QA and software testing skills

  • Designing test cases from a requirement, including boundary and equivalence cases rather than only the happy path
  • Risk-based and exploratory testing, including where the learner chooses to focus and why
  • Writing a clear, reproducible bug report that a developer can act on without going back and forth
  • Reasoning about automation, including what is worth automating and what is not, and why
  • A regression and coverage strategy, including how the learner decides what to re-test after a change

A worked rubric criterion

You define the criteria and levels. Scorafy grades each answer against them, with the evidence.

Criterion

Writes a bug report that a developer can act on

1Not yet competent - reports a vague symptom with no steps, no expected-versus-actual, or no environment, so the issue cannot be reproduced
2Competent - gives clear reproduction steps, expected and actual behaviour, environment and severity, so a developer can reproduce and prioritise it
3Exemplary - isolates the smallest reliable repro, distinguishes symptom from likely cause, attaches the right evidence, and frames the impact so the team can triage it correctly

Why a quiz won't cut it

A multiple-choice quiz can confirm a learner knows the difference between boundary and equivalence testing, but it cannot show whether they would design tests that catch real defects, prioritise by risk, or write a bug report a developer can actually use. Testing skill lives in the judgement - what to test, what to skip, how to communicate a defect. That only shows up in the actual artefacts and how the learner explains them. Scorafy grades that open-ended evidence against your rubric, so you assess the testing judgement, not the terminology.

Written, video, audio or file

A recorded walkthrough is valuable for QA because explaining how you found and isolated a defect is part of the skill. A learner can upload a screen recording of an exploratory session or a walkthrough of their test design, plus the test cases, bug reports and any automation as files. Scorafy assesses the walkthrough alongside the written work against your rubric, so a learner who reasons through their testing clearly is assessed on that reasoning.

A qualified person signs off

Scorafy drafts the scoring against your rubric and references the evidence. A qualified assessor reviews every result, overrides anything, and finalises it. The AI score is kept alongside the human-final score as an audit trail, so no decision is solely automated and every result can be explained.

Compliance and defensibility

Bootcamp results decide whether a learner is signed off as job-ready, so the human check matters. Scorafy is built compliance-first under the GDPR and the EU AI Act. An instructor reviews and signs off every result - there is no solely-automated decision about whether a learner has met the standard. Every score keeps an audit trail showing the cited evidence and the instructor who confirmed it, which is what you show learners or an accreditation body when a result is questioned.

Frequently asked questions

Does Scorafy run my learners' tests or automation scripts?

No. Scorafy is not a test runner. It reads the test plan, test cases, bug reports and any automation as evidence against your rubric, cites what supports each judgement, and an instructor signs off. If you need to execute the tests, run that separately and assess the wider work in Scorafy.

Can it assess test design and a bug report, not just whether tests pass?

Yes. That is the point. Scorafy assesses how a learner designs test cases, prioritises by risk and writes a reproducible bug report against your rubric, and shows the evidence behind each score for the instructor to confirm.

Does software decide whether a learner passes?

No. Scorafy drafts the scoring against your rubric and shows its reasoning, but an instructor reviews, can override any score, and signs off before the result is recorded. No pass decision is made by software alone.

Is Scorafy a defect tracker or LMS?

No. Scorafy is the assessment-feedback layer. It grades open-ended testing work and gives feedback against your rubric, and it works alongside whatever defect tracker, test tools or LMS you already use.

See it on your own rubric

Start free, build one rubric, and run a real submission through it before you decide.