AI assessment for compliance training
Rubric-graded, human signed-off. Not a quiz generator.
Free plan - no card required.
Scorafy is the assessment-feedback layer for compliance training and certification. It reads a learner's open-ended submission - a written scenario response, a case study, a policy-application answer or a recorded explanation - then maps it to your rubric with cited evidence taken from the work. A qualified reviewer checks every result and signs off before it is recorded, so no judgement is made by software alone. Built for defensibility: every result carries a human sign-off and a full audit trail. It is not a policy-management or registry system - it handles the part where the learner's applied understanding is assessed.
What you assess for compliance training competency
- Applying a policy or regulation to a realistic scenario, rather than reciting the rule in the abstract
- Recognising a compliance risk or red flag in a situation, including a conflict of interest or a reporting trigger
- Choosing the correct action and escalation path, including who to tell and when
- Reasoning through a grey-area case where the right answer is not obvious, and justifying the decision
- Documenting the decision and the rationale so it would stand up to review
A worked rubric criterion
You define the criteria and levels. Scorafy grades each answer against them, with the evidence.
Criterion
Applies a policy to a grey-area scenario and decides on an action
Why a quiz won't cut it
A tick-box quiz can record that someone clicked through the policy, but it cannot show whether they would actually recognise a red flag, apply the rule to a messy real situation, or escalate at the right moment. Compliance competency is applied judgement, and "they passed the annual quiz" is weak evidence if a regulator asks. That judgement lives in how a learner handles a scenario and justifies the decision. Scorafy grades that open-ended evidence against your rubric, so you assess genuine understanding, not click-through completion.
Written, video, audio or file
A recorded response adds value when you need a learner to explain a decision in their own words, which is harder to fake than ticking the right box. A learner can upload a recording walking through how they would handle a compliance scenario, plus any written documentation. Scorafy assesses the spoken reasoning alongside the documents against your rubric, giving the reviewer real evidence of applied understanding to confirm.
A qualified person signs off
Scorafy drafts the scoring against your rubric and references the evidence. A qualified assessor reviews every result, overrides anything, and finalises it. The AI score is kept alongside the human-final score as an audit trail, so no decision is solely automated and every result can be explained.
Compliance and defensibility
Compliance assessment is exactly where defensibility matters - you may need to show a regulator that staff genuinely understood and applied the rules. Scorafy is built compliance-first under the GDPR and the EU AI Act, and assessment is treated as a higher-scrutiny use of AI. A qualified reviewer checks and signs off every result - there is no solely-automated decision. Every score keeps an audit trail showing the rubric applied, the evidence cited, and the reviewer who confirmed it, which is what turns "they did the training" into defensible proof of competence.
Frequently asked questions
How is this better than our annual tick-box compliance quiz?
A quiz records completion, not understanding. Scorafy assesses open-ended scenario responses against your rubric, so you see whether staff can actually apply the policy and recognise a risk. A reviewer signs off each result and the audit trail shows the basis, which is far stronger evidence at audit.
Can the rubric reflect our specific policies and regulations?
Yes. You write the rubric, so it can require learners to apply your own policies, codes or regulatory obligations to a scenario. Scorafy grades the evidence against those criteria and shows the reasoning behind each score.
Does software decide whether someone passes compliance training?
No. Scorafy scores the evidence and shows its reasoning, but a qualified reviewer checks and signs off every result before it is recorded. No competence decision is made by software alone.
Is Scorafy a policy-management or GRC system?
No. Scorafy assesses submissions and produces a defensible, human-signed result. It is not your policy-management or GRC platform - it plugs into the part where applied understanding is assessed and works alongside the systems you already use.
See it on your own rubric
Start free, build one rubric, and run a real submission through it before you decide.